Bad Conventional
Wisdom, Then and Now
“By 1960, progressive
income taxation on the one hand
and income support
measures for the poor on the other
hand were accepted by
all but the most unreconstructed
conservatives.”
Herbert
Stein, Presidential Economics. Third Revised Edition 1993
(Chairman,
Council of Economic Advisors under Nixon)
Since 1980 a whole
lot of deconstruction has been going on, particularly in the Republican Party.
Mr. Stein, who was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) in the
Nixon Administration and a founder of the American Enterprise Institute,
considered himself a Rockefeller Republican. This brand of fiscally moderate,
internationalist Republicanism is all but extinct. There may be a member or two
of the species still alive in Maine but it’s not clear a breeding pair has
survived.
Since 1980 a strident quasi-religious brand of conservatism
has fully captured the Republican Party. They’ve rediscovered all the bad
advice that Andrew Mellon gave Hoover and made it part of their dogma. The
empirically based conservatism of Milton Friedman is no longer part of the received
wisdom.
They claim that we are heading down the Grecian path to
fiscal ruin while extolling the austerity policies that guarantee decline.
There is not a shard of evidence demonstrating that austerity is an effective way
out of the current economic problems facing the Greeks or the rest of west. Iceland
has the one crisis economy that is
actually generating some heat and their policy is determinedly anti-austerity.
It’s been over four years (Dec ember 2007) since the
recession officially began and three years (June 2009) since the recovery
officially started. It is the first major financial crisis since the Great
Depression and involves all of the major western economies. Even the German
banking system is fragile.
The US is recovering very slowly and Europe is stagnant. At
the current pace of recovery it will be years before we regain a semblance of a
fully employed economy. How did we get here?
Our sustained prosperity of the 1990s was framed by monetary
and fiscal policies antithetical to the current conservative cant. Taxes were
raised early in the recovery process and monetary policy accommodated the real
expansion. The result was an unequaled experience with 108 months of
uninterrupted expansion, falling unemployment rates, stable prices and falling
federal deficits.
Clearly the monetary and fiscal policies of the period were
consistent with uninterrupted prosperity. At the very least policy didn’t get in
the way. At the same time structural changes were occurring. Manufacturing was
continuing its relative decline, internet industries were enjoying birth and
growth, and the financial sector was undergoing growth and deregulation.
Until the current serious financial crises, post WWII history
of business cycles indicated that monetary and fiscal policies in the western
economies has been consistent with shorter, less extreme business cycles than
pre-WWII experience. This is a modest claim, but indicates monetary and fiscal
policy as practiced in the US has been more beneficial than its conservative
critics claim.
These critics have now left the reservation and are
preaching a version of fiscal and monetary austerity that is theoretically and
empirically bankrupt given the current circumstances. This bizarre advice has
been followed by the Euro Zone countries and the results are apparent. The
southern tier of countries has gone from recession to depression. The Irish and
British economies are returning to recession and their debt loads are
increasing. The German economy is heading towards a stall speed. It’s all pain
and no gain. At some time common sense will triumph ideology. In the meantime
unemployment will increase and debt will increase. This state of affairs can
only be characterized as economic sadism.
No comments:
Post a Comment